{"id":2065,"date":"2015-02-14T01:42:48","date_gmt":"2015-02-14T01:42:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/?p=2065"},"modified":"2015-04-27T23:43:09","modified_gmt":"2015-04-27T23:43:09","slug":"gizen-does-not-mean-hypocrisy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/2015\/02\/gizen-does-not-mean-hypocrisy\/","title":{"rendered":"Gizen does not mean “hypocrisy”"},"content":{"rendered":"

When you look up the word gizen<\/em> \u507d\u5584 in a Japanese-English dictionary, the word “hypocrisy” often comes up<\/a>. But the two words are very different.<\/p>\n

According to Daijirin, gizen<\/em> means “a good deed that doesn’t come from the heart, but is only for appearances’ sake.” But Merriam-Webster defines hypocrisy as “the behavior of people who do things that they tell other people not to do”, and Wikipedia defines it as “the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticizes another.” <\/p>\n

DictJuggler<\/a> gives gizen<\/em> the amusing psychological translation of “dissimulation.” Gizen<\/em> refers to good deeds that do not match an inner attitude, and modern “hypocrisy” refers almost exclusively to bad deeds that do not match an outer attitude. How did this happen?<\/p>\n

In fact, a shocking thing has happened to the English language. The Japanese-English pairing given would have been accurate 100 years ago, which is likely where dictionaries get their definitions. For example, this is an accurate translation of Edward Allen Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart<\/a>“:<\/p>\n

I could bear those hypocritical smiles no longer!
\n\u507d\u5584\u8005\u3081\u3001\u3053\u3093\u306a\u4f5c\u308a\u7b11\u3044\u306b\u306f\u3082\u3046\u6211\u6162\u3067\u304d\u306a\u3044\uff01<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

(Mr. Poe’s narrator uses the word “hypocrite” to indicate that he was not being taken seriously and he knew it.)<\/p>\n

But this is no longer an accurate pairing for modern usages, because the original meaning of “hypocrisy” has been changed, and a French loanword has been introduced into the English language to take its place: r\u00f4le<\/em>. In modern English, gizen<\/em> means “playing a role,”<\/strong> which is a behavior that sociologists somewhat crudely attribute to all human beings.<\/p>\n

Before 1880, the word “role” was barely even used in English, as this Google Ngrams chart shows:<\/p>\n

\"adoption<\/a><\/p>\n

Nor was it common to think of people carrying out their duties as mere actors playing roles. This was described, before 1880, as “hypocrisy” — a word that meant behaving in a way not in accordance with your true feelings. Hypocrite comes from the Greek hypokrites<\/em> \u1f51\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c4\u03ae\u03c2, which simply means an actor in a play. From ancient times it was also used in such a derogatory fashion, in accordance with the traditional disdain for actors<\/a>–a centuries-old prejudice which came to an end, perhaps not coincidentally, around 1900.<\/p>\n

True, there was a character in a Shakespeare play who at one point mused, “All the world’s a stage, \/ And all the men and women merely players.” This character (Jaques, from As You Like It<\/em>) was meant to be melancholy and forlorn, to a humorously exaggerated extent. Even in this sentence, his use of the world “merely” reflects how this statement offers a cynical and depraved view of humanity.<\/p>\n

R\u00f4le<\/em> came to English through French, not in the works of any specific author, but as a slow trickle that eventually became a flood around the turn of the 20th century. Given that the French language also uses the word hypocrite<\/em>, and presumably pre-20th century France had enough Greek speakers to know what it meant, how did the comparable word r\u00f4le<\/em> come to take on a neutral connotation?<\/p>\n

To answer this, I looked at an online dictionary of French<\/a>, and discovered to my amusement that the earliest citation they have for the word r\u00f4le<\/em> being used in a social or political sense is from the year 1789. To wit:<\/p>\n

Mon r\u00f4le, \u00e0 moi, est celui de tous les \u00e9crivains patriotes ; il consiste \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter la v\u00e9rit\u00e9.<\/em>
\nMy r\u00f4le<\/em>, to me, is that all of patriotic writers; it is to present the truth.<\/p>\n

Abb\u00e9 Siey\u00e8s, “What Is the Third Estate?” (1789)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Why does Abb\u00e9 Siey\u00e8s use the word r\u00f4le<\/em> here instead of devoir<\/em> (duty)? There are two obvious reasons for this:<\/p>\n

1. Abb\u00e9 Siey\u00e8s was a faithless clergyman who got a job at the Second Estate simply to fatten his bank account and further his writing career. He was already playing a r\u00f4le, and was a hypocrite in every sense of the word. It would not be too hard for him to see radical pamphleteering as just another r\u00f4le to play.<\/p>\n

2. During the Revolution, perhaps, people recognized that they were not executing any duties. Even if they disingenuously claimed to be “presenting the truth,” in fact they were only actors playing r\u00f4les in enabling the disintegration of the monarchy.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, I urge you to stop translating gizen<\/em> and gizensha<\/em> as “hypocrisy” and “hypocrite,” and instead to find more appropriate words that bring the point of the Japanese home. Also, I urge you to help fix the English language by referring to people who do good<\/em> deeds for ignoble reasons as “hypocrites.” Minds will be blown.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When you look up the word gizen \u507d\u5584 in a Japanese-English dictionary, the word “hypocrisy” often comes up. But the two words are very different. According to Daijirin, gizen means “a good deed that doesn’t come from the heart, but is only for appearances’ sake.” But Merriam-Webster defines hypocrisy as “the behavior of people who […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[37],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2065"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2065"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2065\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2358,"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2065\/revisions\/2358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avery.morrow.name\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}